| Liang, Miao Yu (Maggie) | |
| Should Euthanasia Be Legalized? |
|
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/1044793.stm
With the development of medical science, great
changes have taken place in medical treatments. Nowadays, euthanasia
becomes a universal issue. Some people believe that euthanasia should
not be legalized due to the significant improvement of the health care;
while others completely agree. Euthanasia is a quick and painless death
to be chosen for dying people to cause their death. It also called
“mercy killing,” or assisted suicide. Generally speaking, euthanasia can
be categorized into two groups, which are active euthanasia and passive
euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves killing whereas passive
euthanasia involves letting someone die. The difference between those
two is the cruces of medical ethics. In active euthanasia, the doctor
does something to patient’s death, for example, injection; however, in
passive euthanasia, the doctor does not do anything to the patient’s
death, and the patient dies due to his ills.
Take two doctors who come from Australia and Netherlands for examples.
http://www.tennessean.com/opinion/nashville-eye/archives/04/06/53196437.shtm
Although the Netherlands has become the first country in the world where
euthanasia is legal; from my point of view, the law against euthanasia
should exist. Furthermore, health research should continue to be carried
out and people’s awareness of the medical treatment could reduce the
pain should be promoted. As Dr Peter Ravenscroft mentioned before, if
euthanasia is legalized, it is not good for looking further treatment.
People need to understand that the patients’ pain can be controlled by
the modern medical method. As far as I am concerned, euthanasia should
not be legalized! |
|
| August 2004 | |